Use sysctl() != -1 instead of !sysctl() to check if
the function call succeeded. NetBSD 4.0 returns positive values on success, but NetBSD Current and FreeBSD return zero. OpenBSD's man page doesn't tell what sysctl() returns on success. All these BSDs return -1 on error. Thanks to Robert Elz and Thomas Klausner.
This commit is contained in:
parent
173368911c
commit
60ccb80c9c
|
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ cpucores(void)
|
|||
int name[2] = { CTL_HW, HW_NCPU };
|
||||
int cpus;
|
||||
size_t cpus_size = sizeof(cpus);
|
||||
if (!sysctl(name, 2, &cpus, &cpus_size, NULL, 0)
|
||||
if (sysctl(name, 2, &cpus, &cpus_size, NULL, 0) != -1
|
||||
&& cpus_size == sizeof(cpus) && cpus > 0)
|
||||
ret = (uint32_t)(cpus);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ physmem(void)
|
|||
uint64_t u64;
|
||||
} mem;
|
||||
size_t mem_ptr_size = sizeof(mem.u64);
|
||||
if (!sysctl(name, 2, &mem.u64, &mem_ptr_size, NULL, 0)) {
|
||||
if (sysctl(name, 2, &mem.u64, &mem_ptr_size, NULL, 0) != -1) {
|
||||
// IIRC, 64-bit "return value" is possible on some 64-bit
|
||||
// BSD systems even with HW_PHYSMEM (instead of HW_PHYSMEM64),
|
||||
// so support both.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue