Switch to uint16_t as the type of range coder probabilities.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6c5306e312
commit
eb348a60b6
|
@ -60,11 +60,24 @@
|
|||
// Type definitions //
|
||||
//////////////////////
|
||||
|
||||
// Bit coder speed optimization
|
||||
// uint16_t is enough for probability, but usually uint32_t is faster and it
|
||||
// doesn't waste too much memory. If uint64_t is fastest on 64-bit CPU, you
|
||||
// probably want to use that instead of uint32_t. With uint64_t you will
|
||||
// waste RAM _at maximum_ of 4.5 MiB (same for both encoding and decoding).
|
||||
typedef uint32_t probability;
|
||||
/// \brief Type of probabilities used with range coder
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This needs to be at least 12-bit integer, so uint16_t is a logical choice.
|
||||
/// However, on some architecture and compiler combinations, a bigger type
|
||||
/// may give better speed, because the probability variables are accessed
|
||||
/// a lot. On the other hand, bigger probability type increases cache
|
||||
/// footprint, since there are 2 to 14 thousand probability variables in
|
||||
/// LZMA (assuming the limit of lc + lp <= 4; with lc + lp <= 12 there
|
||||
/// would be about 1.5 million variables).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// With malicious files, the initialization speed of the LZMA decoder can
|
||||
/// become important. In that case, smaller probability variables mean that
|
||||
/// there is less bytes to write to RAM, which makes initialization faster.
|
||||
/// With big probability type, the initialization can become so slow that it
|
||||
/// can be a problem e.g. for email servers doing virus scanning.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// I will be sticking to uint16_t unless some specific architectures
|
||||
/// are *much* faster (20-50 %) with uint32_t.
|
||||
typedef uint16_t probability;
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue